Vater Araignee

I was speaking to a therapist so that she could get an idea as to the type of person my wife lives with and determin a course of action. I thought the concept was amazingly intelligent. After several sessions that had me biting my tongue because of the stupid questions used to illicit stock responses, I gave this response. Is there any additional information you want to give me? OK, then do not say a word to me until I tell you I am finished. If the glass starts out empty and you add liquid to the half point then from one perspective it is half full because you where in the act of filling but from another perspective it is half empty if you consider the state it started at. If you fill the glass then remove liquid both statements would still be true and absolutely none of them can be used to determine if a person is a pessimist or an optimist. As I was walking to the door. Where did you get your degree, the Freud University for Retard Therapists? I poked my head back in. Don't worry, I'm not going to tell my wife your a hack, she will figure it out in time. And just in case you didn't notice, I am never going to tell you I'm finished. Anyway, my basic answer has always been based on the direction of the liquids travel. always = as long as I can remember. My mother also claims that I would say I don't know or what glass.

Betelgeuse Betelgeuse Betelgeuse.

What you consider if contrary to fact is irrelevant in the face of the true definitions of the words. ATHEIST 1 : one who believes that there is no deity AGNOSTIC 1: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god You can not be an atheist and claim that there might be a god. As soon as you do, you no longer have the belief that there is not one, you have become non committal. Or you are a simply despicable character who is trying to score points, just in case. So we will be in heaven because my ultimate reward would be non existence and my ultimate punishment would be an immortal consciousness watching fools bask in the glory of something that doesn't give a shit about anything but documenting an experiment. Fortunately for me if there is a god it doesn't care about what you believe which actually means I'm in a win win win situation. If I'm good I get to stop existing, if I'm bad I get to stop existing and if there isn't a god I get to stop existing.

as simply a bad movie I would list it but according to the rules set in the first post I would not. It isn't as bad as Dracula 3000 but like that movie it has no redeeming qualities.

Is the glass half empty or half full? How do you answer that question? I'll give my answer later.

Admitting that there may or may not be a god makes one agnostic, believing that there is not a god makes one atheist. That is not so humble fact.

Counters with a sinkhole Then points out that he is stupid enough to put in a bid to live in another sinkhole.

Had me scratching my head saying what does rolling any die have to do with LARPing? The closest I ever came was a version of rock paper scissors using colored beads. Three colors, each one beats the next. Say you had a level three whatever and the opponent had level two protection for that whatever. You pull out three beads in any color combination and the opponent pulls out two. Each single bead in you hand vs all the beads in theirs and the same for them. Who ever accumulates the most wins, succeeds. Damage is calculated on the difference in wins and 100% wins for the attacker = exceptional accuracy for extra damage but 100% losses = backfire for self inflicted damage. And we only did that for technical games, most of the time we relied on our actual skills and just swung, fired and threw things of course those where not really LARPing either.

I was agreeing with you but disagreeing with their alternate message, I didn't mean to imply that you also disagreed with it. What I was trying to get to was simply the alternate agenda and the fact that men are looked at worse for identical behavior by many of those who want equality. I'm still trying to personal figure out what dressing like a slut exactly is. The first thing that pops into mind is nude with I fuck all askers painted on and dildos hanging out of every hole. To me, it doesn't matter how "sexy" a person is dressed they cant be dressed like a slut unless they are wearing text advertising it. Of course I also believe that if we legalized full nudity, teach the children that it is ok and execute violent sexual offenders then eventually society would have less problems to worry about because nobody would be freaking out over the mundane.

OK I gotta admit that when I read the title the lyrics to Toxic Love ran through my head. Don't ask me why me of all people decided to hide it behind the spoiler, I cant explain what is prompting me.

I gotta agree with Chern and disagree with their "show the world that SLUT is something to be proud of." that just stinks of alternate agenda. I was a slut, I'm not proud of it anymore and it isn't because "The world made me feel bad about it" it is because I came to understand the kind of damage that I did and I could have been imposing on others. One last thing, slut is less negative than womanizer even though they mean the same thing. Womanizer implies that only the man is at fault.

Having zero counter points to what has been pointed out, using not just hyperbole but absurd hyperbole and connecting one subject you disagree with to another you disagree with in which you had zero counterpoints to what had been pointed out and used not just hyperbole but absurd hyperbole.

The last part first. You can not acknowledge the possibility of god and be a true atheist. I'm assuming it was added by a person that either doesn't know what an atheist is or refuses to give up the word for self description. Now if you went and swapped the prime words in it, though it would sound absurd it would still hold true. I honestly don't think that the quote Typical Christian Behavior unquote isn't actually typical. It is indicative of Loud Christian Behavior and unfortunately because most atheists are prefer not to discus religion at all leaving everyone to see the outspoken atheist who is for all intent and purpose identical to the loud christian. Just a snippet of agnostic nosticisms wisdom. Unfortunately we still have to be pushy about others pushiness. The most pleasant conversation I ever had about the non/existence of god was with Jesuit priest who was an an atheist. Turns out he started out believing lost his faith but continued to serve the church as if he was a believer because he had concluded that most people need god because in his words "Most of them would behave despicably without fear of the boogieman." Now that is an argument for religion that I wish I could dispute beyond saying that is what law is for.

Well your posts on this topic appear to take course directly from the 2nd neocon commandment. When you have nothing to support your stance, you should resort to baseless belittlement. ~~~~~~~~~~~ I just found out that the body was dumped even faster than I though. Supposedly he was lowered into the water before 5:30 pm Pakistani time. That is less than 12 hours from TOD. Now everything I was constantly hearing on different news channels and NPR was that he was genetically confirmed before dumping. Now I was willing to believe that somehow with perfect genetic materiel they somehow managed to break the DNA analysis record by 75% using base 3 Short Tandem Repeats (something like 1 in 20k chances for a false match with uncontaminated materiel) and even that speed has crossed into the realm of self bullshiting. But faster than 12.5% of the 4 days it takes for B3 STR 454 pyrosequencing? Now I haven't pointed out all of the inconsistencies and fallacies but I have pointed out enough to show that we are being lied to in some way. Honestly you don't have to know what is being covered up with a lie to know that it is a lie. To those who can't bring themselves to admit it, I genuinely feel sorry for you. For the rest it is up to you to decide if you care or not.

And you still haven't. The phrase calls your actions not you.

How neocon of you.

Crushes Trump with proof of his stupidity.

What will change if they tell the truth? That in and of its self would be change. I'm not gonna sit here and be a false patriot cheering the lie. I'm not gonna be a false patriot by being unquestioning. As long as I have my first amendment right I'm going to be a true patriot by pointing out all the bull and trying to get others to see it and react in an attempt for a peaceful change in the right direction. I'll also point out that even if this staged event was true, anyone who gives Obama a shred of credit for it is an idiot.

What you just said is the equivalent of "Don't pay attention to that man behind the curtain." The whole you are right it doesn't matter when he dies except for the fact that they are lining about it... profusely.

Abandoned? Now I would like to dig through the rubble myself, starting to think I would find gutted alkaline batteries.

WOW it didn't even take a week and the story fundamentally changed. Now it is no longer a wound above the left eye but the shot went into the eye. He didn't use a woman as a shield. He was unarmed. There was no Al CIAda fire fight. The situation room photos of Clinton and Obama are false. They did not see it unfold live like originally claimed. This last bit disturbs me because Leon Panetta said it so I estimate that it has a 90% chance of being a lie. Q: Why kill an unarmed man who nobody is trying to defend and potentially has so much valuable intell and could better serve the public with a trial then quickly dispose of the body in a non-recoverable manor? A: Because he was already dead a long time ago and you don't want people knowing it.

My previous post was an approximation of the following. My intention was only to translate what I had heard over the Part 15 news network. No opinion that I have was formulated by it nor intended to be expressed by its relay. The exact translation is. Now wile I didn't gain an opinion it did confirm a conclusion. Cops should shut the hell up and take the time to actually learn the law and stop looking like the fucktards they appear to be when spewing about shit they have zero training in. It may have been a gas leak but the cop that said that I will guarantee didn't have a clue at the time. Considering the known activity taking place in the building I could have used a more educated guess and said it may have been a chemical explosion. Most people would be amazed to find out the explosive potential contained in a small dry cleaning business. Hell using could have, may have or my best guess helps prevent one from looking like a fool.

Wizard. I don't understand why the would take three positive traits and list them as negative.

The building housed a part time commercial linen and laundry service. Firefighters searched the rubble once it cooled down to make sure there was no one inside. One man injured and treated on the scene. Police said that it was caused by a gas explosion. Warren Fire Commissioner Skip McAdams said that the cause of the blast wasn't known. Consumers Energy crews were checking the area.

It is a bullshit defense because I say "why an unrecoverable disposal method" and an individual decides to point out that it acceptable with Islam. Just because the method is acceptable does not make it a legitimate defense against the context of the question. It is like me saying why the hell would you paint an outdoor pylon with watercolors when the rain will wash it away and you say because safety orange is an acceptable color. Bullshit defense.