Vater Araignee

Global Warming: Doomsday Called Off Exposing the flaws in the Theory of Global Warming, IE the entirety of the theory that supports it being man made.

Connick v. Thompson

got threatened?

It is not our obsession, it is what mass media decided was our obsession and parrents deciding that the boobtoob is the babysitter. When a jerk that trows a ball through a hoop is presented as a hero and an astronaut its life just by sitting on a launchpad is a side note, what can be expected. They constantly write for the lowest denominator, so it can not be hoped that higher function will come about by anything more than accident.

I should break out the white lab coat and rush over to Walgreen's so I can get paid to feel the ladies up. ducks and runs for the nearest fallout bunker.

My pops got forced to retire cause of Clitorises shit. It took two people with books of sensitive info to replace him and what was in his head. He was also held onto as a "civilian specialist" for 4 years. So I guess you could say that after forced retirement over 10 pounds that he could not lose it took him and two others to do his job.

Even more reason for me to despise mercs.

National Public Radio wile popular isn't exactly mainstream. I do remember hearing about them during the Scientology false flag attacks, but that's it.

Hmmm. Why haven't I heard any mainstream news about them other than arrests? I have heard about leaks that have caused big problems for big people but those leaks where never attributed to this group. http://www.youtube.com/embed/Qf17WaXrHTA Link to article URL in the video On Wiki Now my personal opinion is they pose as almost big a threat as what they claim to be fighting.

Of course you did.

That's exactly what I thought.

Once again I suggest you do some research. Your lack of knowledge invalidates your argument. How hard can it be to look up the word? How hard can it be to read the Geneva convention? If you have internet access then it isn't hard at all. Belligerent Etymology From Latin belligerēns (“waging war”), present active participle of belligerō (“wage war”), from belliger (“waging war, warlike”), from bellum (“war”) + -ger (from gerō (“wage, carry on”)). 1. Engaged in warfare, warring. 2. Eager to go to war, warlike. 3. Of or pertaining to war. 4. (By extension) Aggressively hostile, eager to fight. 5. Acting violently towards others. Nothing about being foreign. Are you a student parroting what a professor that wants you to stop thinking critically is saying?

Now your sounding like me sans my statements about both sides working for the same goal. When you look at executive orders that is when president become obviously become culpable. Same goes for declassified document and leaked documents. Don't forget the fact that a proven lie is proof of a lie and if someone backed up the lie then it is proof of conspiracy even if we don't know what they are covering up. Don't forget that Barry Soetoro I mean Barack Obama didn't even talk to congress when he had Libya attacked. His action states outright that congress and they law means nothing. Hell Bush should have been impeached for implying he was above the constitution too. No person is above the Constitution, no person is below the Constitution and all who attempt to violat it should be executed for high treason. This isn't to say that we should never ratify the Constitution but to act against it without ratification is treason.

Woodland BDU Jacket with black hiking vest on over it.

is good to see some humor.

That's hyperbole I hope, because if it is not then I am forced to assume you are speaking an independent language that takes advantage of preexisting syllable combination's and therefor wile your structure seems familiar, no knowledge of actual intent behind the communication can be claimed from my side. Oh wait, that is hyperbole too... or is it? Funny thing, when I first heard bling-bling and d'oh where in the dictionary I looked in a hard copy of MW 2010 unabridged. Bling-bling was not included and d'oh was listed as slang aka vulgar argot. I also know that they are not in the Cambridge or Princeton dictionaries. The inclusion or exclusion of a slang term in a dictionary does not invalidate the meaning of another word. Anything to the contrary is a piss poor argument at best, at worst it is just fucktarded.

Rebel also equates to terrorist based on who is attacked. If a foreign power attacks only American military, they are a belligerent not a terrorist, à la Rebel Alliance. You have evidence that Washington knew about plans for the Boston Tea party when there is no evidence that Adams even knew? Sure, Adams claimed that it wasn't mob rule but a legitimate protest but praising an action doesn't in itself constitute a terrorist act. (That is why almost a decade latter Osama bin Laden still has not been indicted for the 911 attacks, no admission of guilt + no proof = no indictment.) Then you have the fact that the only fear that was caused by the "destruction of the tea" as it was know by until approximately 1833/34, was caused by reports of Mohawks being involved and that was quickly dispelled because people that actually bothered to look saw that they where white men poorly disguised as Mohawks. Now you want to use the depriving the populace argument as terrorist activities, nobody has been able to put fourth proof of deprivation. Sure they where deprived any of that particular tea, but tea from other sources legal and not quite illegal where still being brought in, running the gambit from inferior through superior to the destroyed tea. But ya know what? Don't take my word for it, research the definitions from multiple sources (old and new, so you can get an idea as to when things started to change) research international treatise, conventions and laws. And most important of all, research history so you don't claim someone was involved in something they where not.

Cambridge terrorist noun the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear rebel noun a person who is opposed to the political system in their country and tries to change it using force, or a person who shows their disagreement with the ideas of people in authority or of society by behaving differently Webster no entry for terrorist terrorism 1. violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), perpetrated for a religious, political, or ideological goal, deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants. 2. Violence against civilians to achieve military or political objectives. 3. A psychological strategy of war for gaining political or religious ends by deliberately creating a climate of fear among the population of a state. rebel noun from Latin rebellō, re- (“again, back”) + bellō (“I wage war”) understood to be ("I wage war back"). A person who resists an established authority, often violently. Notice the difference between the words? I am so sick of people accepting mass media definitions as if they where gospel then casting things that where once considered good into a bad light for the fascist agenda. ~~~edit to add~~~ By definition, I can, and will, call anyone who supports and or willingly funds the murder of civilians a terrorist.

Using your line of logic, that would make the American military the biggest terrorist organization in the world... If you believe that they had nothing to do with 9/11. I also find it interesting that you choose to compare the Founding Fathers to not one but two proven CIA sponsored organizations. Calling a freedom fighter a terrorist equates to allowing tyranny to reign. You know tyranny, the unrestrained despotic abuse of authority. I'm sorry to have to inform you but you can not respond to a tyrant who is by definition a terrorist with terrorism, only rebellion. Qualifier: as long as you are only attacking agents of the tyrant.

There are 13 geocaches there too, 4 of them I haven't found so I might look for them too. If anyone with a GPSR is interested, I would be happy to give you a primer and coords to local caches.

Bagel! Cream cheese or peanut butter?

bump

I don't think you would have any legal recourse if you denied him information and got refused housing because of it. If I remember correctly the only monetary rule a landlord is prohibited from making is based on source of income a good attorney may be able to make a case of the CC# requirement as a source of income violation. So the best thing you can do is to try and find a fair housing attorney who will give you a cheap consult. READ: Fair Housing Laws and Presidential Executive Orders Public Act No. 112 Michigan's Fair Housing Act of 1968 It may be possible for you to find county and local municipality laws also.

No the Empire where terrorists, the Rebels where not the ones that destroyed Alderaan to show their strength. The Rebels didn't attack non imperial representatives. Even if you think that there where civvies on the Death Star, then according to US doctrine since WWII, blowing the thing up wasn't a terrorist activity. But you just keep going with what ever lie the fed decides to feed you today and keep on making issues Republican or Democrat when both parties are actually carbon copies when it comes to the truly important issues.

God Grew Tired of Us Meh, I'm assuming it didn't have its intended effect one me. Of course I'm the kind of person that couldn't give a shit about a starving kids in another town until the starving kids of mine are dealt with so I can't give a shit about the atrocities of another government till mine is taken care of.