Vater Araignee

First that doesn't sound anything like "Libya brook the no-fly zone." Second, that plane shot down by the rebels was supposedly one Gaddafis. Read as no investigation that can't be investigated anyway. Third it is not a treaty, that would imply that both the government and the rebels agreed to it. But it comes out that UNSC resolution 1973 isn't just the initialization of a no-fly zone, it allows for "appropriate response" without definition of "response to" or what is "appropriate". It has been a long time since I read the United Nations Charter but I seem to recall provisions against interfering with the internal affairs of a country under civil war. Of course it only takes a majority vote of the permanent members to change it so if the U.S.A, France and the U.K. change their minds, then it is so. Wow 192 members and only 3 out of five of them are technically required to change policy.

If true then that would warrant attacking rebels not Libyan military installations.

that will play in hell.

Zombie strippers. Not the worst zombie movie, but not something I would watch again. well the billiard ball scene was hilarious.

Oh I get it, UN-mandated no-fly zone = launch missile attacks before the no-fly gets violated. Well screw false flagging that's just antagonism in it's purest form.

Correct but if you go on factual behavior of the past then if we enter war with Libya then it will be because of a FFO, an outright lie or a violation of our own laws. Advance Knowledge of Pearl Harbor. Operation Ajax Bay of Pigs Gulf of Tonkin Attack on USS Liberty And many more.

Even better, that means the CIA can down a French pilot, blame the Libyan government, and America goes to war and gain back some French love.

Well UNSC 1973 has passed. So here is what I think is going to look like happened. America will be enforcing the no-fly zone over Libya. The Libyan government fire upon and down and American. America will deploy, spreading troops even thinner. Here is what will really happen. America will be enforcing the no-fly zone over Libya. There will be a false flag operation firing upon and downing and American. America will deploy, spreading troops even thinner.

The guy probably owned a copy of the Declaration of Independence The bill of rights Gadsden flag or Navy Jack And owned silver coins. You know those are all things that make the FBI, CIA, DHS, blah blah blah look at you like a possible Domestic Terrorist.

I use to know a Chernobyl electrical tech, that man knew how to live on nothing. Anyway the west coasters are just a bunch of panic stricken nutters who deserve nothing more than to pay 500 bucks for a 20 dollar supply of KI. You would think that this would be driving up the price of kelp too but those idiots wont eat it unless you wrap it around a onigiri and call it sushi.

Now the scaremongers have the west coast causing KI shortages. The site that Sweden claims they will be able to detect fallout soon. Like they detected fallout from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. OOOOOOOO did west coast American suffer ill effects from those? I'm not sure about this, maybe Chernobyl can answer. Have people located in America when Chernobyl went critical gotten sick from it? All these people are going to do is give the government another in to ban the sail of over the counter vitamin and minerals. We all know that big pharma wants it, now this unwarranted panic just gives 'em another plank on the bridge.

must concur with the previous statement. Network made in 1976, how prophetic.

I agree that we need to stay out of it. Sometimes a civil war needs to happen. With our track record we have no business picking sides. Ho Chi Minh, Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, the Taliban, just to name a few we backed at one point.

It is all spin and media control. The majority of the populace will not find out the true reasons behind anything unless it furthers the goals of the uppers. I had to find out what is going on in Egypt and their drafting of a new constitution by accidentally stumbling on a blog that caused me to research further. Basically the choice is hurry up and except this or the military takes control and decides, never mind that it amounts to the same thing. Why don't we just hand them ours? It served us great for a very long time and we aren't using it so let them have it.

We made those provisions for American Citizens. You don't sign away your citizenship when you join the armed forces PERIOD END OF QUOTE.

Translation: The U.S. government has the right to ignore the Statute of the International Criminal Court Explanatory Memorandum (International Human Rights law), the Geneva Convention, and prosecute anyone who exposes them for doing so. Dude the Oath of enlistment has ordered things according to importance. It say that first you will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and you hold your faith and allegiance to it. Then you go on to obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over you. The reason it is worded like that is because if the President and or officers appointed over you go contrary to the Constitution of the United States, they become the enemy of the Constitution of the United States and as such you are sworn to protect it against them. Now violating International Human Rights law and the Geneva Convention don't exactly amount to violating the the Constitution, but claiming sovereignty for the force that is tasked with the job of protecting the Constitution is in fact unConstitutional. When you join the armed forces you do not give up your citizenship so at worse Manning should be charged with illegal search and seizure, but he wasn't turning over evidence to be used in prosecution so there actually isn't a 4A violation. Notice the idea of prosecuting the individuals involved in the "Collateral Murder" video has not been posed by the government? That is because of a perceived Fourth Amendment violation that doesn't actuality exists according to Herring v. United States. If this man is allowed to be convicted, then the temperature just went up a degree on the frogs pot. My personal opinion is that he should not be charged at all because we mad provisions that protect whistle blowers. Now I also personally hate coming to realization that Manning is in the right. Why? Because it makes me sound like a fucking hippy. SIDE NOTE: did you know that this subject, regardless of what side any of us are on, if found, gives us a check mark towards terrorist classification for "debating controversial issues"?

You are correct, it isn't, yet. And yet it is. Forget what immediate effects Chernobyl had on the surrounding area. Then ask yourself, who profited from Chernobyl's melt down. Oh yes, someone or better stated some group profited from the change in the mindset of many individuals. Mark my words the "demand cheap nuclear energy" movement over here is going to suffer again. Back to the immediate human tragedy over there, someone will die trying to keep containment. The earthquake isn't done claiming lives. Or if you want to listen to the nut jobs HAARP isn't done.

When I went to add it I got the green save button, that put it in my Saved DVD queue. That means that they don't have a copy of it available to send out and they don't have a copy sent out either. Just like "Romeo & Juliet vs. the Living Dead" and "Tao of M".

Ah, but even the dvd is no longer available. I should have made that a tad clearer. You cant get 1984 from Netflix at all. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH THE BIG BROTHER DOESN'T WANT US TO SEE THE FUTURE!

Careful, that will get you branded as a domestic terrorist.

Just wondering if anyone may have heard about why Netflix no longer distributes 1984. At one point I had it in my queue but before it hit my #1 slot it became available for instant view. Out it goes from my dvd queue and into my instant view queue. Before I got around to watching I canceled every media subscription I had except the internet so I could save some choe. I get Netflix back and no 1984. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH THE BIG BROTHER CONSPIRACY IS COMING TO GET ME!