Gaf, I thoroughly disagree with you. It doesn't follow at all. If the original argument had contained some scientific, not just semantic, proof that necessarily singularity = god, there would not be so much disagreement here. To conclude that necessarily the opinions of those who disagree comes from some outside mind-controlling source as opposed to one's own ability to question a premise is insulting. Not only have you confused semantic with mathematical argumentation, you have developed a false polarity in which either someone MUST accept your claims or he is brainwashed.
It can be argued that whatever the singularity is, there was one, and it MAY have been God, but there is no absolute proof that singularity = god or, even, singularity = act of god.