Jump to content

i need a link


Anathema

Recommended Posts

ok. so my husband claims that they are "growing/creating" chickens that have no heads or feet (just a body) for human consuption for girls to make their boobs bigger. can someone find me a link please for this? he says it is the chemicals/hormones that make girls ta ta`s larger.

(no i am NOT gullible)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard something of this before, and it's at least partially true. They do give chickens growth hormones but it's to make them bigger, not peoples' breasts. They want to have the largest chickens at the supermarket so that people are more likely to buy them. It's done with other livestock for the same purpose. The growth hormones that they give these animals may account for a lot of man-boobs, among other problems like depression. Anyway,the average chicken is too large for it's legs to support it by the time of sluaghter...and they do cut off their beaks (clean off) when they're young so that they can't peck each other...since thier lives are spent in a 3X2 cage with about 11 other birds. But I've not heard of a headless, legless variety per say.

Try the PETA website, they're bound to have some information this related.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard something of this before, and it's at least partially true. They do give chickens growth hormones but it's to make them bigger, not peoples' breasts. They want to have the largest chickens at the supermarket so that people are more likely to buy them. It's done with other livestock for the same purpose. The growth hormones that they give these animals may account for a lot of man-boobs, among other problems like depression. Anyway,the average chicken is too large for it's legs to support it by the time of sluaghter...and they do cut off their beaks (clean off) when they're young so that they can't peck each other...since thier lives are spent in a 3X2 cage with about 11 other birds. But I've not heard of a headless, legless variety.

Try the PETA website, they're bound to have some information here related.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
kids in general are bigger than they were years ago,all because of growth hormones the FDA puts in the the livestock.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard something of this before, and it's at least partially true. They do give chickens growth hormones but it's to make them bigger, not peoples' breasts. They want to have the largest chickens at the supermarket so that people are more likely to buy them. It's done with other livestock for the same purpose. The growth hormones that they give these animals may account for a lot of man-boobs, among other problems like depression. Anyway,the average chicken is too large for it's legs to support it by the time of sluaghter...and they do cut off their beaks (clean off) when they're young so that they can't peck each other...since thier lives are spent in a 3X2 cage with about 11 other birds. But I've not heard of a headless, legless variety per say.

Try the PETA website, they're bound to have some information this related.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

nice. oh the joys of humanity! i was hoping for headless chickens though even if i do know it is not really possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is really cruel what people do to the animals we eat. I have been forced to sit down and watch multiple videos when I was in school about how they treat these animals and somedays after watching one of them, I would be so horrified I would not eat and I am a guy that loves to see gore and such in movies so for me to be grossed out by this, was a major thing.

I don't really know if they are trying to genetically f*** around with these creatures and all but seriously, where are to good days when they were free ranged? Bet they taste better to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is really cruel what people do to the animals we eat. I have been forced to sit down and watch multiple videos when I was in school about how they treat these animals and somedays after watching one of them, I would be so horrified I would not eat and I am a guy that loves to see gore and such in movies so for me to be grossed out by this, was a major thing.

I don't really know if they are trying to genetically f*** around with these creatures and all but seriously, where are to good days when they were free ranged? Bet they taste better to.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Freerange animal products are still available but in the United States, 'freerange' isn't always literal--legally, 'freerange' can be advertised on a a product as long as the conditions the animal endures meet certain specifications, which basicaly means that the animal gets to see sunlight at least one hour, every couple of days; it doesn't necessarily mean that the animal is kept cage free, or in non-factory conditions. In some countries however, 'freerange' is quite literal, and in some countries, true freerange farms are the only type allowable by law. I'm honestly not sure how things are in Canada.

But anyway, I've never understood why, unless someone is a masochist, that they would willingly eat factory farm meats, as if they need to consume meat so expediantly. To me, I'd rather eat anything else, if it comes down to it, than develop a nice set of breasts, for example. -I can go a few days without while I save for something better. But then again, it's not required that restaurants advertise what exactly they use, so I'm not sure what I'm eating all the time. Although, if I knew a particular place used factory meats in their kitchen, I'd not eat there, just like I do not shop at markets that peddle factory products.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Headless chickens???  Last I checked all living animals needed to breathe air and eat and stuff. :blink

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Back in the 30's, there was a famous chicken that lived for several months (or more, I forget) with its head cut off. The guy that chopped hit it just above the brain stem. Usually when you cut a chicken's head off, it runs around for about a minute and twitches and dies. He waited for it to stop running around- and it didn't, because it still had enough of its brain to function. They fed it with a baster down its gullet or something like that (How ironic would that be?) and it eventually died, but not after they took it on tour and showed it off. There's a statue commemorating it somewhere in the plains states.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've yet to see anything on discovery channel on vegetarian spiders, considering to be classified as a spider I believe they all have to drink blood to be considered spider. I kinda looked it up, I'm lazy though. But, at least you have evidence.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20...11singular.html

Maybe it's because all spiders are meat-eaters. Or more precisely, bodily fluid-suckers. There's no such thing as a vegetarian spider, only vegetarian-eating spiders.

edited because I am not quite as lazy as i thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.3k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 65 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.