Steven Posted April 28, 2007 Report Share Posted April 28, 2007 But, i think in practice, this is sort of a "chip away at abortion rights" ruling and the language seems to leave open the possibility of a further extending of this concept to even more restrictive rulings in the future. I cant help but think this is part of a larger plan , rather than a end in itself. The case itself almost seems as if its hand picked to deliver this "mild" ruling, but sets itself up as a potential benchmark to use in more invasive rulings in the future. well yeah, of course it is. I dont think it will ever be ruled out completely, but I've no problem admitting that there is a wider agenda here, some of which I have agreed with. This is not really unique however, it seems to be how many things get done in this country, on both sides of the coin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.