Jump to content

Questions Surround Senate Inquiry Of Televangelists


Recommended Posts

I'll save my comments/thoughts for a little bit later, but I was curious to hear your ideas on this situation - how it does or does not fall into seperation of chruch and state, and where this may or may not be leading, and finnaly, your thoughts on spirituality as governed by the state here America.

have at it folks.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071204/ap_on_...angelists_probe

Steven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not a separation of church and state issue in any way. This seems to be a legit investigation of so-called religious organizations and their leaders. It seems pretty damn convenient to have a ministry that has as a central tenet that it's members should get rich. What a farce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, the way the laws are written... I hope these Church's tell the government to take a flying leap. The senate has no business investigating citizens, not matter the reason. Let the IRS do their own dirty work. We don;t need the feds trying to regulate faith.

:blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prosperity is fine. Greed isn't. Taking advantage of people isn't. Co-opting religion and spirituality isn't.

Co-opting what religion? Who's spirituality? If their brand of religion teaches that God wants people to be rich and to do everything they can to get to that point... What gives you or anyone else a right to say that it's wrong?

I have major issues with the Unitarian Church but that doesn't mean I want to make it illegal or have government oversight for it.

We have the Bill of Rights thing. It protects everybody, not just liberals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Co-opting what religion? Who's spirituality? If their brand of religion teaches that God wants people to be rich and to do everything they can to get to that point... What gives you or anyone else a right to say that it's wrong?

I have major issues with the Unitarian Church but that doesn't mean I want to make it illegal or have government oversight for it.

We have the Bill of Rights thing. It protects everybody, not just liberals.

This not about liberalism Mark, so stop generalizing with that brush. This is about me thinking that these televangelists are con artists using religion and "god" as a way to make a buck. If they operated as a business but otherwise did the exact same thing I would have less of a problem with it. I don't think legislating religion is the answer. I think you're right that the IRS should be the ones making the inquiries... but sometimes they need a little leadership, ya know? And yeah... people let themselves be duped into this... but some people aren't very bright and some are in vulnerable emotional states. So they should be allowed to be taken advantage of for the sake of freedom of religion? I think not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've watched a few minutes of Joyce Meyer now and again. She's definitely charismatic.

I like s straight shooter....its the language that I understand the most. She's been included in this investigation on prosperity ministries but I dont beleive she fits the bill - Benny Hinn definately does, but she's much more of an "let's equip ourselsve sto live this life" kind of gal, which I like.

Incidently I was once in a Xtian rock band that was endorsed by TBN/channel 40. We played some high profile gigs for that scene - and the church who was doing the majority of the funding wanted Benny Hinn to come out in white and introduce us - on Television. I told them if they did that that I'd walk right up to the mic and tell the television crowd that Benny Hinn was a false prophet.

it didint go over well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't you think it should be answered BEFORE the investigations start?

I'm not entirely sure it's answerable. No matter where you draw the line a lot of people will be unhappy. They should be conducting these hearings with respect to tax law and if these guys are using religion as a cover for what's really a business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not entirely sure it's answerable. No matter where you draw the line a lot of people will be unhappy. They should be conducting these hearings with respect to tax law and if these guys are using religion as a cover for what's really a business.

And then this leads you into HOW to determine if these religions are jsut money making schemes, therefore some standard must be written and set into law, and some agency of enforcement must represent that standard and so on, and so on, and so on....

I hate corruption too....but the tragedy is that were treading upon certain founding national ideals.....

and so it would seem to me that once we begin to flirt with this dangerous area - we end up making a sweeping mandate for acceptable state recognized spirituality......

and im quite sure this will one day happen, as I ve said before....I beleive that a man like me will be outlawed for the good of the republic...perhaps even in my lifetime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you're such a martyr... =P

hmmmm, I'm not afraid of it and thats not meant to be said in the romantic sense....

besides, take a look around at some other countries here in the modern era, what I'm thinking is really not that far fetched at all, and this democracy of ours is ripe for the pickens historically speaking ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is: warning that the investigation could be unconstitutional.

the groups are not legally required to disclose financial information to the Senate.

"This has nothing to do with church doctrine," said Grassley, who has been investigating nonprofit compliance with the tax code for years. "This has everything to do with the tax exemption of an organization

They are exempt from what I understand....so.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.1k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 81 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, it's over.   Last year I was finally happy that people on the block had started talking to me and I even started conversing with them and helping with their yards despite my people fear.  But it wasn't to last.   Midday today, I got blasted with the accusation that I called the police on my neighbor's vehicles that were parked across the street in a lot he had told me that he owned (which is the only reason I was cutting that lot for him).  Nevermind the fact that the City sent out an ordinance stating that vehicles parked on the grass will be towed at the owner's expense.   Today, I requested that he move a trailer bed with a car on it that belonged to him, but had been blocking my driveway apron next to my house for the past nearly 3 weeks.  He began talking about it being a public street and that he didn't see a driveway and how it was a vacant lot and some other stuff.  I side that I owned the lot, but didn't have the money to put in a driveway yet and that if I don't put one in soon, the city is going to come and take my driveway apron away.  He began walking away, quoting parking ordinances and then said that because I had asked him to move his vehicle that I must have been the one who called the police on his parked cars because he side the police kept coming back to check if the vehicles were there (on City property).   At first I thought he was joking and I said that I didn't know anything about that I just wanted him to move the trailer back 10 feet.  He didn't like what I had to say and went on a tirade about stuff that I had no clue about, but apparently I did it because I live on the block, across the street, multiple houses down from the vacant lot he was parking in that belonged to the City of Detroit.   Trene stepped in to defuse the situation because I lost my mind.  All the decades of accusations from all the other neighbors (past and present) that had been directed at me simply for being on the block, just exploded and I was out there making a total spectacle of myself trying to clear my name.  But all that does is make an accuser feel more justified in their blind truth.  I left it alone.   My feelings are hurt.  I don't care about any of those people anymore because it's like they are just sitting and waiting to blame me for something else that they don't like that happened to them.   My trust for anyone on this block is now gone and I am physically drained and embarrassed.  My mind keeps replaying the entire event and will continue to do so for the next few hours or so...because that's how my brain works.   I'll try not to let this consume me because I could be THAT person they accuse me of being, but then that would backfire because they would be like, "I KNEW IT!!!". 😔
    • 10:16pm - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 75 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • There are worse things to be known as.  Anyway... "In addition to my other numerous acquaintances, I have one more intimate confidant.  My depression is the most faithful mistress I have known~no wonder, then, that I return the love." ~ Soren Kierkegaard
    • They have meds for that :P   Honestly I need to try me some of that Adderall one of these days.  I'm a bit scared to though because I might actually do something.
    • I know a Japanese-American girl.  I do not know if she actually speaks it or not though.  She's dating my friend Kurtis. Though I imagine you could go out to eat at a Japanese place and just strike up a conversation with people and see if anything sticks. Anyway...  I miss my car :(  You lose a lot of agency without one, and soon it will be too cold to bike.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.