Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Some wierd thing......

14 January 2008

Michigan's Messed-up Primary or Small Town Joys

Perhaps you've heard about the messed-up presidential primary in Michigan. The State Party Muckety-Mucks, tired of having our ballots cast after all the decisions had already been made, stated that they would move our presidential primary to January 15th. The National Party Muckety-Mucks, said, "Oh, no," and threatened to penalize the state, should the primary move.

The primary moved; we've been penalized. Oh look, cause and effect. The only candidates who've been campaigning here are Romney, McCain, and Huckabee. Let's just say that it made for some exciting TV watching this weekend. NOT.

It's not yet clear whether any of Michigan's Democratic delegates will be seated at the convention this summer, which is why the candidates aren't bothering to campaign here. It's also why most Democratic candidates aren't even on the ballot. And, apparently writing in my choice disqualifies my vote. So, my limited presidential primary voting options are as follows. (1) Vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton. She's on the ballot, but she's so not my choice for President. (2) Vote for Dennis Kucinich. He's on the ballot, but he's also not my choice (though he's a far sight closer than HRC). (3) Vote for Uncommitted Delegate. There's absolutely no guarantee that the delegate will support the candidate of my choice, but at least I'm not voting for the candidate NOT of my choice, right? (4) Say screw it and not vote at all.

To make matters more complicated, I left Ontonagon this afternoon. Now, what you may not know about me is that I am a committed voter. I don't skip elections. I believe deeply that voting is a privilege. But neither could I couldn't quite justify making an extra 232 mile round trip in order to vote in this debacle. Especially not to vote for Mr. or Ms. Uncommitted Delegate. So, this morning, I called the Town Clerk and begged to vote by absentee ballot, which he allowed me to do, about 20 minutes before he closed the office. I LOVE living in a small town.

I'm feeling pissed off about the whole situation. I've been an Obama supporter for over a year now, and I feel ripped off that I didn't get to vote for him. On the other hand, I did get to exercise my civic duty. And, I suppose that's really what this is all about. And, I got to appreciate, yet again, the joys of living in a small town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why couldn't we vote for Obama in the primaries???? He wasn't on it. And he would have won.

It's a long story...

basically MI changed it's state law against the wishes of the two main parties and the Democrats decided to boycott... as well as the republicans but just not as many

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a long story...

basically MI changed it's state law against the wishes of the two main parties and the Democrats decided to boycott... as well as the republicans but just not as many

The news kept saying that if you didn't see your candidate on the ballot that you were to vote "undecided" so that you didn't have to vote for someone you didn't want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this was the Primary. You are not actually voting for who is going to be President in a Primary, you are voting for Delegates at the Democrat or Republican nation conventions this summer. It's there that the delegates vote for the party nominee and then the real elections starts.

Eternal and I brought this up before... the DNC screwed Michigan and Florida voters. We dared to to say when we were to vote. The Democrats punished Michigan by taking away all of thier delegates and for some reason half of Floridas. They further said that if a Dem campaigned in that state they would loose all delegates from that state.

On the Republican side of things... I'm not sure whats going on... Michigan seems to still have all of it's delegates and Florida has half...

The State governments that moved thier Primarys are fighting this wrong... The RNC and DNC do not trump the constitution. The constitution defines how we vote somewhat clearly... giving each state the power to decide when and how a primary is conducted. RNC and DNC rules should not be able to over ride that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be Cali, NY, TX and um... the really high population states.

Michigan and Florida were trying to influance the final vote by voting before other states.

Well, this little stunt to influence the final vote really didnt work anyway because didnt our votes only count for half of what they should. Thats just dumb to me. Why couldnt we have waited? Whos idea was it to change our primary day? Was it Granholm? I wouldnt be the least bit surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not confused. The whole delegate count thing is irrelevant to my point. Michigan and Florida are important to the pre-nomination process because they are important to the post-nomination process.

I thought you said you were done with me, or are you just a sucker for being put in your place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again, I type faster than I think. I don't know what it is, but Gaf sets something off in me.

I respectfully reject your assertion that I am confused. I was making a point that is irrespective of delegate counts, and apparently, I was less than clear. The national parties and the state parties screwed Michigan and Florida over for pointless reasons, since ten million and fifteen million people bring their own inherent importance to the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK. I'll try to ask this question in a way that wont offend you.

Michigan has lost all say in who is to become the democratic nominee for the general election because they tried to influence voting in other state's primary elections. They were doing this by using a known and accepted aspect of human psychology that I like to call the sheeple affect. That is to say, people tend to do (vote) what other people do (vote).

What does that have to do with the electoral college? The two elections and election systems are completly seperate.

Why are you being irrespective of the topic? and what exactly was your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.5k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 89 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am currently floored.   FedEx did a massive 6 box delivery to the wrong address.  I had an autoship order scheduled to arrive before this past weekend.  Nothing showed up.  I contacted the order site and they had a link for the order...a photo of all my boxes thrown in the snow and up the sidewalk of a residence that was not mine.   You would think that at some point, the driver would have looked at the delivery address after they kept throwing box upon box at this location with no shelter from the elements.  They didn't even knock on the door to inform the residents that massive 65+ pound boxes were left all over their walkway.  Nope.  Just dumped them, took a photo as they were walking away and left.   I wonder what the person who found all of those misdelivered boxes must have been thinking when they saw them.  Maybe they kept everything to use, distribute or sell.  No idea.  No claim was filed on that end as of yet.   Fortunately for me, one of the sites that I ordered from, replaced everything at no extra cost.   Unfortunately, now I'm concerned for the other items yet to be delivered.   Needless to say, I'll be watching my notifications like a hawk.
    • 12:00am - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 47 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • 12:00am - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 60 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • 11:13pm - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 69 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • ~~~~~ Yeah, thank you for the check-in.   Happy to say it was all a misunderstanding.  But she pulled out her "ghetto" and that's when things went South.  I get very professional minded when I enter into situations like that because when someone starts bring the court into conversations, I'm in court 2 times a year, every year, so don't go there with me because I will get legal all over you.   She did try to change what she thought she might have said, but I had to call her on it because it's all in written text.  Then she apologized and we were able to have a decent conversation.   I know I joke about me talking so much that people don't hear what I say except for keywords that they are looking for, but that is exactly what happened here.  She heard "payment", "money" and "help out".  It was crazy.  I literally had to have the entire conversation all over again, but I definitely condensed it to only address those 3 words.   Things are back on track, but I emphasized that if she every needed clarification for anything, please say something first instead of jumping to conclusions, then questioning that conclusion, then answering that conclusion, then getting upset at the answer and taking it out on someone who doesn't have a clue what the San Juan Hill just happened.   But this is exactly the reason I do everything with a paper trail. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.