Simon Bar Sinister Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 I was reading about the Duggars (some family from AK, I think) who just had their 18th kid. That makes 10 boys and 8 girls. If I remember right, dad's 43 and mom's 42. Their oldest kid is 20. edit: got the name wrong. fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayne Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 THAT is too many, in my book. I might be crazy though. I have four (two girls and two boys -- ages 9, 8, 6 and 4). It's not so bad. I always wanted 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Bar Sinister Posted December 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 THAT is too many, in my book. I might be crazy though. I have four (two girls and two boys -- ages 9, 8, 6 and 4). It's not so bad. I always wanted 6. My friend Camille is the youngest of 6. 7 years from oldest to youngest...and there was a 2-year gap between #3 and #4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev.Reverence Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 THAT is too many, in my book. I might be crazy though. I have four (two girls and two boys -- ages 9, 8, 6 and 4). It's not so bad. I always wanted 6. ...that seems cool...I think when you get over 10...you need to STOP. .....not that I think it a smart thing to have more than 5-6... 7 seems like just TO MANY! I don't know why...just 7...it's to many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bean Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 For me, that's one of those "whatever works for you" kinds of things. I know I couldn't deal with more than one child, but I'm not going to look down on people who have more than one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TygerLili Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 Well, for me one would be too many. For others, as long as they can afford all their children and aren't asking for handouts, then whatever works for them. I find it hard to believe that two people can adequately parent more than 6 children, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Msterbeau Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 2 iz enuf thnx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsleofRhodesEnt Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 78...seriously...WAY too many kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jynxxxedangel Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 I knew some people named D'Inverno years ago, who had about 14 kids. They actually drove a "church van" around (a long van, with four bench seats in back)! Mom was petite, thin, and pretty, too! Hard to believe, after having so many.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomCat Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 2 iz enuf thnx. i concur...and some days I question if it's one too many! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livininxtcgoth Posted December 19, 2008 Report Share Posted December 19, 2008 There are some parents that come in to my shop toting around 4-6 children (often all dancers, all eating up tuition and dance shoes and clothing... i can't imagine being able to support those costs). To be honest, meeting these parents is better birth control than the children are. You can have the most polite and well behaved children in the world but if you have enough of them it's still going to drive you crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Bar Sinister Posted December 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I knew some people named D'Inverno years ago, who had about 14 kids. They actually drove a "church van" around (a long van, with four bench seats in back)! Mom was petite, thin, and pretty, too! Hard to believe, after having so many.. You call them "church vans", I call them "tard wagons". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
honeymustard02 Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 For ME 3 I think would be my top number. As for other people. If you can afford it and actually care for all them rugrats and provide a stable loving home then more power to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taysteewonderbunny Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 For ME 3 I think would be my top number. As for other people. If you can afford it and actually care for all them rugrats and provide a stable loving home then more power to you. I would have to agree, in terms of my biological contribution. But three only because I don't get to see my first one and because I don't want to have an only. I'm actually hoping that if ever I am pregnant again, it is with twins. Otherwise, just two. That is to say, if I am pregnant once more (and it will be only once more provided it is to term) and have only one other, I am adopting a second. Yet, I also hope to raise my kids in a home with lots of children both because I love chaos and because my own childhood home was rather lonely for my brother and I--we always envied our cousins whose extended family (on the married-in side) was so close and so large. That's part of why I would like to live in a commune-type environment, I think. Remaking tribal type communal living in the modern world with many people of all ages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prick Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 I believe that all the children of the world are mine so there isnt anything as too many! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destroit Posted December 20, 2008 Report Share Posted December 20, 2008 Seven. Anything more than six is tipping the scale a little too much, imo. I don't see how you could physically and possibly give enough individual attention to each child adequately. Hell, if I had my way, everyone would be an only child. You have no idea the glory and the awesomeness of being control of everything at all times and getting whatever you want. It's kinda like this: Other kids were jealous of me growing up due to my only childness...and still are . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaneDead Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 i have 3 and 3 is enough for me. i think it is too many when you can't even handle them anymore... and for some people that only means having one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michiko_Dreads Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 TWO is fine for me and THREE is maximum. I couldnt have anymore than that...I'd go crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ManicQueen Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 I was reading about the Duggars (some family from AK, I think) who just had their 18th kid. That makes 10 boys and 8 girls. If I remember right, dad's 43 and mom's 42. Their oldest kid is 20. edit: got the name wrong. fixed. I watch the show they have on TLC every week.. I love them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aequorea Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 Well, for me one would be too many. For others, as long as they can afford all their children and aren't asking for handouts, then whatever works for them. I find it hard to believe that two people can adequately parent more than 6 children, though. From what I have heard, at a certain point the older kids start parenting the younger ones... For better or for worse LOL It was just my brother and I growing up, and I always thought it would be fun to have more people around. I think I wanted more cousins though. I would have been pretty cranky about having to share my bedroom. For myself, I would think at least 2, no more than 5. Who knows, though... So far I am at 0. (shrug) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomCat Posted December 21, 2008 Report Share Posted December 21, 2008 i have 3 and 3 is enough for me. i think it is too many when you can't even handle them anymore... and for some people that only means having one Sadly, this is often true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homicidalheathen Posted December 28, 2008 Report Share Posted December 28, 2008 More than you can afford or any really, there are too many people on the planet as it is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burrich1 Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Personaly, I think you should never let your kids out number you. Then you cant keep an eye on all of them at once, and who knows what they could be plotting.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amalthea23 Posted January 2, 2009 Report Share Posted January 2, 2009 For me? One. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taysteewonderbunny Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 Do you know why it is that newborns have that soft spot in their skulls? So you can pick 'em up, five to a hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.