Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Senate is special. It was always meant to be the chamber of deliberation, where all members were equal and could craft policy irrespective of party. Sadly, it doesn't always work like that.

If Specter honestly and adequately serves the nation and Pennsylvania, I don't really care if he has a "D" or an "R" after his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Senate is special. It was always meant to be the chamber of deliberation, where all members were equal and could craft policy irrespective of party. Sadly, it doesn't always work like that.

If Specter honestly and adequately serves the nation and Pennsylvania, I don't really care if he has a "D" or an "R" after his name.

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just a play to try to stay in office by a career politician.

I'd say that's part true. Let's keep in mind he was a moderate republican from Pennsylvania and quite a few moderate republicans from Pennsylvania switched to the democrats last November

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly I think there should be term limits on those people. Seriously when a person is in there for 30+ years how is that helpful to anyone?

But can't you imagine if I was a senator for 30 years?

How great would that be Tits? Especially considering my campaign slogan

Don't vote with your hearts and minds. Vote with your tits and ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly I think there should be term limits on those people. Seriously when a person is in there for 30+ years how is that helpful to anyone?

Yeah! I don't want a doctor or a banker or an auto mechanic or an accountant or a professor or a lawyer who has been in his field for 30 + years. Damn accumulative competency.[/sarcasm]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah! I don't want a doctor or a banker or an auto mechanic or an accountant or a professor or a lawyer who has been in his field for 30 + years. Damn accumulative competency.[/sarcasm]

It's different in politics. When someone has been pushing the same agenda for 30+ years, and refusing to change for the better it's time to get them out of there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say though I did always like him. Even before the switch. He really isn't a rubber stamp for either side and their aren't too many people left like that on either side

But the problem with Specter is that he has never been known to cast his vote or push an agenda for "the people". He has always taken what ever stance he thought would keep him in office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's different in politics. When someone has been pushing the same agenda for 30+ years, and refusing to change for the better it's time to get them out of there.

That's what the vote is for. I would normally agree with you, except that term limits don't work the way that they are supposed to. Instead, they tend to give lobbyists MORE sway, not less. With term limits, consider the disadvantage when you have LOBBYISTS in the field for 30+ plus years and senators that are permitted only three terms. It's proven a disaster on the state level; I don't want to see what would happen on the federal level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what the vote is for. I would normally agree with you, except that term limits don't work the way that they are supposed to. Instead, they tend to give lobbyists MORE sway, not less. With term limits, consider the disadvantage when you have LOBBYISTS in the field for 30+ plus years and senators that are permitted only three terms. It's proven a disaster on the state level; I don't want to see what would happen on the federal level.

People would actually have to go out and vote for that to happen. Lobbyist need to be taken out the the equation too, but term limits would definatly be helpful too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait...

Your solution to incompetent elected officials and a disengaged electorate is to make voting less important by instituting term limits? Um... I disagree with your methods of reform.

I personally believe voting is very important, but people would actually have to get off their asses and do it, which the majority doesn't. The only reason I believe in term limits is because you get people like Ted Kennedy and Specter who don't do shit anymore then push their own agendas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.5k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 65 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am currently floored.   FedEx did a massive 6 box delivery to the wrong address.  I had an autoship order scheduled to arrive before this past weekend.  Nothing showed up.  I contacted the order site and they had a link for the order...a photo of all my boxes thrown in the snow and up the sidewalk of a residence that was not mine.   You would think that at some point, the driver would have looked at the delivery address after they kept throwing box upon box at this location with no shelter from the elements.  They didn't even knock on the door to inform the residents that massive 65+ pound boxes were left all over their walkway.  Nope.  Just dumped them, took a photo as they were walking away and left.   I wonder what the person who found all of those misdelivered boxes must have been thinking when they saw them.  Maybe they kept everything to use, distribute or sell.  No idea.  No claim was filed on that end as of yet.   Fortunately for me, one of the sites that I ordered from, replaced everything at no extra cost.   Unfortunately, now I'm concerned for the other items yet to be delivered.   Needless to say, I'll be watching my notifications like a hawk.
    • 12:00am - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 47 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • 12:00am - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 60 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • 11:13pm - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 69 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • ~~~~~ Yeah, thank you for the check-in.   Happy to say it was all a misunderstanding.  But she pulled out her "ghetto" and that's when things went South.  I get very professional minded when I enter into situations like that because when someone starts bring the court into conversations, I'm in court 2 times a year, every year, so don't go there with me because I will get legal all over you.   She did try to change what she thought she might have said, but I had to call her on it because it's all in written text.  Then she apologized and we were able to have a decent conversation.   I know I joke about me talking so much that people don't hear what I say except for keywords that they are looking for, but that is exactly what happened here.  She heard "payment", "money" and "help out".  It was crazy.  I literally had to have the entire conversation all over again, but I definitely condensed it to only address those 3 words.   Things are back on track, but I emphasized that if she every needed clarification for anything, please say something first instead of jumping to conclusions, then questioning that conclusion, then answering that conclusion, then getting upset at the answer and taking it out on someone who doesn't have a clue what the San Juan Hill just happened.   But this is exactly the reason I do everything with a paper trail. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.