Jump to content

So. I laughed


Confess

Recommended Posts

Here's another one:

This is why you push with the dominant hand and pull with the support hand creating a solid grip. I don't think either of these women were using their support hand at all.

Edited by Spook
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That happened to me when I fired a shotgun for the first time but fortunately only hurt my collarbone - ouch! I didn't have it solidly against me, didn't realize what would happen when I pulled the trigger. When you aren't used to it you can definitely be taken surprise by the force of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My rifle experience was a collection of bad ideas.

12 years old, was I.

Rifle, bigger and meaner than I.

Adult supervision? 2 drunk uncles.

Scope on rifle.

Butt placement? Under my arm, in the armpit. (I had never seen a gun fired in my life at this point)

So I look under the scope, using iron sights because my drunk giggling uncles said the scope was off.

Placed butt of the rifle under my arm. I didn't know better and wasn't corrected.

Squeezed the trigger - rifle jumped back - scope caught the side of my nose and broke it. Walked around for 2 weeks with a black ring around my eye on top of the broken nose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you see their form? BENT ELBOWS??? Fuck The What?

Proper Weaver stance has bent elbows, but you also use opposing forces with the push/pull method I described above to stabilize the handgun. With isosceles both elbows are locked and with Chapman the dominant elbow is locked though the support elbow is bent. Regardless of the stance, fingers over fingers should be used and not the military's old cupping method.

Grip, stance, and sight alignment should be trained and tested before live ammo is ever used. Anything else is just irresponsible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please tell me this is not one of your family's customs. That's just plain scary.

No, definitely not.

That demonstration totally violates 2/4 of Jeff Cooper's rules of firearm safety:

  • Never point a firearm at anything you are not willing to destroy.
  • Always be aware of your target and what's behind it.

Thus, by firing at the glass it means the shooter is willing to destroy it, "bullet proof" or not, and consequentially anything behind it, namely his wife. Just plain scary, and stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.3k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 86 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.