freydis Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Seriously.... WTF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacohitts Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Well expect everything tween "G" rated and no original plots anymore. my pew sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormKnight (1) Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Well, supposedly those studios with rights to produce certain titles (like Iron Man, Spider Man, X-Men, etc,) will keep those rights. Hopefully, they will be hands off regarding most of the comics But I do find it mildly disturbing. Will Marvel release a bunch of Disney related comics? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Megalicious Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 ugh. Just Ugh. *shakes head* Being a comic dork, I am with SK, I find this mildly disturbing. Then again it could be worse. *nods* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pomba gira Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Bigger is never better when it comes to media ownership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
torn asunder Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n0Mad Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Why does everybody seem to think this will mean the Disneyfication of Marvel? Disney is a huge company with lots of holdings. Disney owns Miramax Films. Remember that Kevin Smith movie "Dogma" that was boycotted by the Catholic church for being evil and even had the character Moobie who was lampooning Mickey Mouse? Yep, a Miramax film, aka, Disney. Disney also owns the distribution rights for Studio Ghibli films and other than handling the dubs, don't change anything. So why would they change Marvel? Disney acquired Marvel because it makes money and changing it wouldn't make money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prick Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Well hopefully this doesnt change the comics any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev.Reverence Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Why does everybody seem to think this will mean the Disneyfication of Marvel? Disney is a huge company with lots of holdings. Disney owns Miramax Films. Remember that Kevin Smith movie "Dogma" that was boycotted by the Catholic church for being evil and even had the character Moobie who was lampooning Mickey Mouse? Yep, a Miramax film, aka, Disney. Disney also owns the distribution rights for Studio Ghibli films and other than handling the dubs, don't change anything. So why would they change Marvel? Disney acquired Marvel because it makes money and changing it wouldn't make money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phee Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I agree with Spook.... Pirates of The Carrabian is essentually a comic book movie without the comic book. And lets not forget that Tron was Disney. And for a period of time Disney owned the label that ICP was on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev.Reverence Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I agree with Spook.... Pirates of The Carrabian is essentually a comic book movie without the comic book. And lets not forget that Tron was Disney. And for a period of time Disney owned the label that ICP was on. ...& released a Marylin Manson song... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phee Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 ...& released a Marylin Manson song... Well.... that is actually a strike against Disney IMO... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev.Reverence Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Well.... that is actually a strike against Disney IMO... lol ....the point was not that you like/dislike the band...they are 'fuckin'frieks'...&Disney put them out anyways...'cause the peoples wanted it. Disney looked at the content of the music, not the outward appearance of the band. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phee Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 This is true.... Disney wants money.... if NOT messing with Marvels formula will make them money... then they won't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev.Reverence Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 ...save, they won't let them cuss. (or cuss rarely){certainly no 'fuck'} FAMILY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marmee_Noir Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 I wouldn't be to wounded if I hadn't seen Ponyo and what the bastard disney did to Hayao Miyazaki..... Oh GAWD the PAAAAAIIIIIIINNNN... I need to go cry now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Deadcat Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 I'm just wondering if Marvel Studios will be allowed to continue as is and if there will be a limit to the number of Marvel-based movies put out. Before, Marvel would license its properties to several different studios and you would have different films come out in the span of several months. DC, being owned by Time/Warner, cannot do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n0Mad Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 I'm just wondering if Marvel Studios will be allowed to continue as is ... From what I've read, any existing contracts are still valid, such as Spiderman 4 which will be produced by Sony, and rides and attractions at Universal Studios. Once the licenses expire, then contracts will be up for renegotiation. My guess is Disney will keep more stuff in house after that but Marvel does have it's own movie production company now so that entity will probably handle the direction of most of the movies. It'll be interesting to see what happens but I think this acquisition is more in line of Marvel helping Disney than Disney fucking Marvel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Deadcat Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 From what I've read, any existing contracts are still valid, such as Spiderman 4 which will be produced by Sony, and rides and attractions at Universal Studios. Once the licenses expire, then contracts will be up for renegotiation. My guess is Disney will keep more stuff in house after that but Marvel does have it's own movie production company now so that entity will probably handle the direction of most of the movies. It'll be interesting to see what happens but I think this acquisition is more in line of Marvel helping Disney than Disney fucking Marvel. Pretty much that's my only concern about this - especially with Marvel's ambitious projects lined up from their own movie company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsleofRhodesEnt Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 *sigh*...you know..with all the death this year....how much longer before Stan Lee pulls a David Carridine?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormKnight (1) Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 Micky Mouse Merger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fidget(+) Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 Yeah I heard about that. As long as Disney doesnt change the comics to much im fine with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marmee_Noir Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 From what I've read, any existing contracts are still valid, such as Spiderman 4 which will be produced by Sony, and rides and attractions at Universal Studios. Once the licenses expire, then contracts will be up for renegotiation. My guess is Disney will keep more stuff in house after that but Marvel does have it's own movie production company now so that entity will probably handle the direction of most of the movies. It'll be interesting to see what happens but I think this acquisition is more in line of Marvel helping Disney than Disney fucking Marvel. Oh that is brutal, I didn't even think about that.... The rides at universal.... I love the spiderman one.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now