Jump to content

"debarking" surgery for dogs


Recommended Posts

I don't really think that many people just go out and do this right away. Its cheaper to train them to be quiet or to get a collar than it is for most any surgery. If training and the other things don't work then how is this wrong? Animals get their junk lopped off all the time and its hard to find one with private parts intact...is this really that much worse? I highly doubt people are getting this done for no reason at all.

And cats can make noise too...my neighbors have told me that before and although its not as loud it is just as annoying when Tiggs is crying for me to come home. So I don't see how cats are a better option...you should have said fish considering the only noise they make is " ".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not to justify, because I think its horrendous, but a lot of apartment complexes, in some states won't allow cats because of the smell of their urine......

yeah, if you can't live with an animal as is, then don't get one.... surgically altering a pet, unless MEDICALLY necessary, is just cruel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read a news story awhile ago, about a guy who got sick of hearing his neighbour's dog's incessant barking (apparently, it was left outside quite often); he took the dog into a vet, had it debarked, and returned it to the neighbour's yard!

I'm a huge fan of critters, and I totally feel his pain...but I would never even think of doing such a thing. My neighbours have a nuisance barker. I've actually contemplated buying a dog whistle to blow, to try and curb it. I have also contemplated walking over there, and feeding it a big spoonful of peanut butter. :hrhr:

If I were to debark anything, it would be my neighbour's rambunctious, rude, noisy children. I don't think either of them possess an "indoor voice."

Edited by jynxxxedangel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's as bad as declawing cats, which is unspeakably cruel and totally unnecessary. And there are plenty of lazy-asses who would run out and do this without even trying to actually train the animal, regardless of the cost... just as so many people get cats declawed without even trying to get them a fucking scratching post or two.

And... spaying/neutering animals is totally different from mutilating them for aesthetic and/or human convenience reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ONLY reason for using such a surgery...is to make a quieter-better-hunter-killer-guardian-beast out of dogs...(half-wolf breeds are good for this)...that said, it is an outdated & barbaric practice, from the dark ages...& should be left to military bases...but, I am not sure we use those...but, we should.....half blood hound,half wolf...they'ld be badasses at hunting talibans...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's as bad as declawing cats, which is unspeakably cruel and totally unnecessary. And there are plenty of lazy-asses who would run out and do this without even trying to actually train the animal, regardless of the cost... just as so many people get cats declawed without even trying to get them a fucking scratching post or two.

And... spaying/neutering animals is totally different from mutilating them for aesthetic and/or human convenience reasons.

Well it is pretty difficult to get a cat with claws now. Strays are the only ones we find where the majority of them have their claws. My cat has two scratching posts, a scratching pad, and countless other objects that we have tried over the years. I have yet to declaw him...but if he gets one more person that comes over to our house I will have to...thankfully my friends don't mind the blood.

And mutilation would include spaying/neutering if we want to use definitions. It is also something for our human convenience most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ONLY reason for using such a surgery...is to make a quieter-better-hunter-killer-guardian-beast out of dogs...(half-wolf breeds are good for this)...that said, it is an outdated & barbaric practice, from the dark ages...& should be left to military bases...but, I am not sure we use those...but, we should.....half blood hound,half wolf...they'ld be badasses at hunting talibans...

They still do use dogs...but due to some rulings it is now "cruel" to use them in searches because apparently people can die or suffer horrible side effects from dogs barking at them...so they are kept around but really only for drug searches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not much of a dog person, partly because the barking drivers me nuts, but I would never consider doing this to a dog. It sounds very cruel and unnecessary. Not only would the dog not be able to communicate, it wouldn't be able to cry for help if being attacked. Why would one get a dog if one didn't want to hear barking?

Spaying/neutering is actually beneficial to animals in most cases because, not only does it prevent unwanted breeding, it reduces the risk of certain types of reproductive cancers and tumors in animals. As someone who lost a cat to breast cancer, I would never consider not neutering another pet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it is pretty difficult to get a cat with claws now. Strays are the only ones we find where the majority of them have their claws. My cat has two scratching posts, a scratching pad, and countless other objects that we have tried over the years. I have yet to declaw him...but if he gets one more person that comes over to our house I will have to...thankfully my friends don't mind the blood.

And mutilation would include spaying/neutering if we want to use definitions. It is also something for our human convenience most of the time.

In many areas it's difficult to find a vet who will declaw cats. It is much less common than it used to be, and is actually illegal in most (western) countries.

AFA spaying/neutering, in addition to the health issues Tygerlili mentioned, it prevents the birth of unwanted animals who would end up sick, starving, and/or abused... I don't think that's really a matter of human convenience.

BTW if your cat is really that aggressive you might want to try some Feliway... the diffuser is more convenient but the spray works just fine. Those little claw caps work really well, too... but the Feliway will address the root of the behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In many areas it's difficult to find a vet who will declaw cats. It is much less common than it used to be, and is actually illegal in most (western) countries.

AFA spaying/neutering, in addition to the health issues Tygerlili mentioned, it prevents the birth of unwanted animals who would end up sick, starving, and/or abused... I don't think that's really a matter of human convenience.

BTW if your cat is really that aggressive you might want to try some Feliway... the diffuser is more convenient but the spray works just fine. Those little claw caps work really well, too... but the Feliway will address the root of the behavior.

He only goes after certain people though...even the people that like cats.

I have never run into a vet that won't declaw cats...except for in Madison but that town is different that the rest of the state. And taking the reproductive organs away still kinda is a human thing...many people do it to avoid more pets, altering the behavior of some pets, and various other things that they don't want...but it doesn't apply to everyone. I was just saying that in the whole mutilation scheme that is does fit...you are altering or removing existing parts and somehow I doubt that the animal gives a shit whether or not you are altering its vocal cords or its private parts...just saying.

My beef here is that the article, and the reactions, make it sound like this is a very common thing. If it was I am sure that the news would be much more wide spread and we would have heard about it much sooner. Fact is that this, like many other things people do to animals, is probably not as common as we would like to think. Honestly there are not that many breeders out there and how do we know all of them do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.5k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 95 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am currently floored.   FedEx did a massive 6 box delivery to the wrong address.  I had an autoship order scheduled to arrive before this past weekend.  Nothing showed up.  I contacted the order site and they had a link for the order...a photo of all my boxes thrown in the snow and up the sidewalk of a residence that was not mine.   You would think that at some point, the driver would have looked at the delivery address after they kept throwing box upon box at this location with no shelter from the elements.  They didn't even knock on the door to inform the residents that massive 65+ pound boxes were left all over their walkway.  Nope.  Just dumped them, took a photo as they were walking away and left.   I wonder what the person who found all of those misdelivered boxes must have been thinking when they saw them.  Maybe they kept everything to use, distribute or sell.  No idea.  No claim was filed on that end as of yet.   Fortunately for me, one of the sites that I ordered from, replaced everything at no extra cost.   Unfortunately, now I'm concerned for the other items yet to be delivered.   Needless to say, I'll be watching my notifications like a hawk.
    • 12:00am - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 47 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • 12:00am - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 60 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • 11:13pm - Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 69 Guests (See full list) TronRP
    • ~~~~~ Yeah, thank you for the check-in.   Happy to say it was all a misunderstanding.  But she pulled out her "ghetto" and that's when things went South.  I get very professional minded when I enter into situations like that because when someone starts bring the court into conversations, I'm in court 2 times a year, every year, so don't go there with me because I will get legal all over you.   She did try to change what she thought she might have said, but I had to call her on it because it's all in written text.  Then she apologized and we were able to have a decent conversation.   I know I joke about me talking so much that people don't hear what I say except for keywords that they are looking for, but that is exactly what happened here.  She heard "payment", "money" and "help out".  It was crazy.  I literally had to have the entire conversation all over again, but I definitely condensed it to only address those 3 words.   Things are back on track, but I emphasized that if she every needed clarification for anything, please say something first instead of jumping to conclusions, then questioning that conclusion, then answering that conclusion, then getting upset at the answer and taking it out on someone who doesn't have a clue what the San Juan Hill just happened.   But this is exactly the reason I do everything with a paper trail. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.