Jump to content

Top Ten things Daevion is WRONG about


Black Sunday9

Recommended Posts

I only have one for now, but feel free to add to the list.

1. Dr. Doom can defeat Superman. Dr. Doom is a two bit villain from the Fantastic Four. His power is a stupid Armor suit. Superman would kill him.

He also said Superman wears "gay" tights. Obviously there is nothing wrong with being gay but Superman is married to Lois Lane, thus he is not homosexual. Furthermore Daevion wears a leather kilt, and while I applaud his choice of formal wear, a man in a kilt should never ridicule a man in tights who has saved the world and made time reverse.

continue this thread at your lesiure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah, but Superman was written as "Mr. Invicible-with-every-power-and-nothing-can-hurt-me". It's like going to play guns at the one kid's house who is always like "You didn't get me!" and refuses to ever die and you can't say anything because it's his house and his toys.

It's not fair, is all I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but Superman was written as "Mr. Invicible-with-every-power-and-nothing-can-hurt-me".聽 It's like going to play guns at the one kid's house who is always like "You didn't get me!" and refuses to ever die and you can't say anything because it's his house and his toys.

It's not fair, is all I'm saying.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Super man has this issue with Kryptonite

He needs sun light or when he uses up his reserves he will weaken and enters a death like coma.

He needs oxygen, though less he can't function indefinitely with out it.

Why do I know these things?

One day I will destroy him.

Hmmm. Kryptonite laced web fluid completely covering him blocking out the air and sunlight.

TRIPLE THREAT!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said superman was a homosexual but he does in fact look really gay in tights....but I think all guys and superheros look gay in tights....I think most people would agree that they would rather see men walking around in kilts than tights. Its pretty hard for guys to pull off the tights thing...there might be a few that can get away with it but they are few and far between.

So girls...what you rather see....Us guys walking around in kilts( skirts ) or walking around in "tights"?

I'll address the Dr.Doom issue a bit later....there are some good indicators that would point to his prevailing against superman. It stands that a genius like Victor Von Doom would smack superman around with some kryptonite lasers built into his armor suit.

DR. Doom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup. It's true. Take it from an old fag hag. Men get married as a cover all the time and anyone who wears tights is ready for the RAINBOW GAY PRIDE PARADE......!!!!!!!

Kilt is still more manly than package-hugging tights.

I'm fairly sure he married Lois Lane as a cover.聽 You know he's still hitting Pendulum every Saturday night after she's asleep...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kilt is still more manly than package-hugging tights.

I'm fairly sure he married Lois Lane as a cover.聽 You know he's still hitting Pendulum every Saturday night after she's asleep...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Tights make the package look bigger. Just ask Poison. I'm not shitting, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said superman was a homosexual but he does in fact look really gay in tights....but I think all guys and superheros look gay in tights....I think most people would agree that they would rather see men walking around in kilts than tights. Its pretty hard for guys to pull off the tights thing...there might be a few that can get away with it but they are few and far between.

So girls...what you rather see....Us guys walking around in kilts( skirts ) or walking around in "tights"?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

American Student banned from Prom for Wearing Kilt

Personally, I'd rather see a guy in a kilt cos hopefully, he's wearing it properly (without underpants), but how many girls walk about in skirts and no underpants on a DAILY basis?

Fact remains, in this country, a kilt is still usually seen as a "skirt" and the men who wear them as "cross-dressers" or "pansies".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kilts are hot. Knobby, hairy knees.....very manly. Mel Gibson wore one and so did Samuel Jackson....and I think rockers who wear tights, are gay. And I loved them anyway. The 80's rocked. Big hair, torn shirts....tights....

American Student banned from Prom for Wearing Kilt

Personally, I'd rather see a guy in a kilt cos hopefully, he's wearing it properly (without underpants), but how many girls walk about in skirts and no underpants on a DAILY basis?

Fact remains, in this country, a kilt is still usually seen as a "skirt" and the men who wear them as "cross-dressers" or "pansies".

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daevion is also wrong in assuming that I'm a man.聽 I'm ALL woman.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

ok, ok I can admit when Im wrong....but than again without a pic how do I really know.

daevion... leave now while you still can... this is your daily spam hate mail... oh, you know what i mean....

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

:laughing :tongue: I like to eat spam hate mail even more than I like to eat cheezIts! :tongue: :laughing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kilts are hot.聽 Knobby, hairy knees.....very manly.聽 Mel Gibson wore one and so did Samuel Jackson....and I think rockers who wear tights, are gay.聽 And I loved them anyway.聽 The 80's rocked.聽 Big hair, torn shirts....tights....

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

How does clothing affect one's sexual orientation?

Wearing flannel wouldn't make you a lesbian any more than tights would make a man gay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does clothing affect one's sexual orientation?

Wearing flannel wouldn't make you a lesbian any more than tights would make a man gay.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

the clothing doesn't really matter...so I agree with you

When I say superman looks gay in tights, what I really mean is that he looks really stupid and lame wearing tights not that he's a homosexual. I guess I should have clarified what I meant when I said "gay".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the clothing doesn't really matter...so I agree with you

When I say superman looks gay in tights, what I really mean is that he looks really stupid and lame wearing tights not that he's a homosexual. I guess I should have clarified what I meant when I said "gay".

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Personally, I think people should refrain from using that word to mean anything BUT those who actually are gay -- I mean, it wouldn't be accepted for people on the board to call each other BIG BAD N-WORD or Christian or Cat Person when they meant "wow, you're acting stupid" or something. It's passivly homophobic to say "that's gay" when the speaker means "that's stupid (looking)" -- after all, not all gays are stupid (looking), so why is it acceptable to equate them as such?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I think people should refrain from using that word to mean anything BUT those who actually are gay -- I mean, it wouldn't be accepted for people on the board to call each other BIG BAD N-WORD or Christian or Cat Person when they meant "wow, you're acting stupid" or something.聽 It's passivly homophobic to say "that's gay" when the speaker means "that's stupid (looking)" -- after all, not all gays are stupid (looking), so why is it acceptable to equate them as such?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Actually I mean that the word gay in this case means something really lame and dumb, not that it meant anything demeaning towards anyones sexual orientation. Anway this is way off topic.....so as to not completely Hi-jack the thread....

Superman is "gay" and Dr.Doom would defeat him easily enough because he is awesome!!!! muhahahahahahahahahaha!!!!! DR.Doom > superman :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I mean that the word gay in this case means something really lame and dumb, not that it meant anything demeaning towards anyones sexual orientation.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay#Word_origins

Well, it doesn't mean that.

The origin of it meaning "lame and dumb" are inherently homophobic and, thusly, demeans a person's orientation.

I doubt anybody would approve of the usage of "straight" or "bi" to mean "lame and dumb" so why is passive homophobia approved of. That's really hetero, if you ask me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay#Word_origins

Well, it doesn't mean that.

The origin of it meaning "lame and dumb" are inherently homophobic and, thusly, demeans a person's orientation.

I doubt anybody would approve of the usage of "straight" or "bi" to mean "lame and dumb" so why is passive homophobia approved of.聽 That's really hetero, if you ask me.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

yeah sure if you wanna get all literal about it......but this thread isn't about approval or politcal correctness...this isn't even about vile distortion of invalid implications....this thread, in fact, IS about getting to the center of tootise pop!!!

I think you hurt BS9's feelings by derailing his thread, and saying there is no santa clause! :laughing :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.4k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 43 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.