Jump to content

DGN is boring.


ZhukovCodeslinger

When did DGN become boring?  

24 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Maybe it's the "we" stuff.  I know for a fact that 2 of the top 3 people running this place don't agree with certain things other moderators have done here.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Before people get freaked out: yes, the moderators disagree. OH NO! Even when I do, I trust that they are acting/speaking in what they think is best for keeping the board jerk-free.

The disagreement is a function of the moderators. Troy asked people to be moderators, in part, because we do disagree. Even then, disagreement is a part of managing people, let alone a message board. It's a little harder with the benevolent dictator on hiatus, but we try to reach concensus as much as possible.

(Thanks, TA, for addressing this. Thought I'd add in my 2 cents.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Heh! or people being bitchy to me because they didn't/don't like Zhuk's posts. Errr, we are two seperate people you know.

Also, there are lots of people on here looking to not be single *if just for a night sometimes* which can exclude some people and turn off others who are looking for a social outlet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, there are lots of people on here looking to not be single *if just for a night sometimes* which can exclude some people and turn off others who are looking for a social outlet.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Right!

There was a time when a few members made this place an outlet for their sex needs......it did turn off more than a few people. IMO this is more a discussion style message board and I feel there are enough web sites that cater to finding sex partners. I really disliked seeing this place becoming that and I'm not alone IMO. I say if you're that desperate go join one of those sites thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

me, sooth and dark vampire have our own clique now.  its the non-clique clique.  its so damn 1337 its not even there! :laughing

i dont let cliques stop me. i crash any party i want here, spout off some random crap, most likely, then leave. :grin

im like a bull in a china shop!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You so rule dude. =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh! or people being bitchy to me because they didn't/don't like Zhuk's posts. Errr, we are two seperate people you know.

Also, there are lots of people on here looking to not be single *if just for a night sometimes* which can exclude some people and turn off others who are looking for a social outlet.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I would never be bitchy to you. :happy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm such a non-comformist that I'm not going to conform with you other non-comformists.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

but by not conforming, you conform cause we're all not conforming together... :erm :nut

We're so non clique I didn't even know about it.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

isnt it great! :grin

You so rule dude.  =)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

:jamin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before people get freaked out: yes, the moderators disagree.  OH NO!  Even when I do, I trust that they are acting/speaking in what they think is best for keeping the board jerk-free.

The disagreement is a function of the moderators.  Troy asked people to be moderators, in part, because we do disagree.  Even then, disagreement is a part of managing people, let alone a message board.  It's a little harder with the benevolent dictator on hiatus, but we try to reach concensus as much as possible.

(Thanks, TA, for addressing this.  Thought I'd add in my 2 cents.)

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Ok I said alot of stuff in this post but I will edit it all out. Check your PM's Jarod.

Some mods are good, some are bad, some use personal vandettas to moderate. Some have no sense of humor, some have good sense of humors. But really, who cares? No one gets paid to mod or read DGN, no one's life is gonna fall apart without this website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right!

There was a time when a few members made this place an outlet for their sex needs......it did turn off more than a few people. IMO this is more a discussion style message board and I feel there are enough web sites that cater to finding sex partners. I really disliked seeing this place becoming that and I'm not alone IMO. I say if you're that desperate go join one of those sites thank you.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I know for a fact that this is correct, many of the threads in the sex forums did turn off people and kept some people away from DGN. Whether or not this is good or bad for DGN is up to others to decide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for a fact that this is correct, many of the threads in the sex forums did turn off people and kept some people away from DGN.  Whether or not this is good or bad for DGN is up to others to decide.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I've been silently agreeing with a lot of what people have to say here, on all counts, 'cause in some way at some time, it's ALL been TRUE.

But this one - the thing that keeps coming to mind is, if a subject bothers you, and it's a pretty damned easy thing to know WHERE that type of subject is going to be posted, don't go there!

I mean, come on. If people discussing their sexuality or proclivities in relation to bothers a person, it's a pretty safe assumption that that kind of talk is going to go on in the SEX & SEXUALITY forum - so don't go there!

And I'm NOT talking about things like, oh, you're reading a thread in the Relationships forum about the latest window cleaner and suddenly someone starts spouting off about fat, Polish blondes. That would have been out of left field and unexpected, and therefore bothersome.

But it's a safe bet that someone is going to post about wanting a 3some in the sexuality forum. Welcome or not, that's where it's going to be.

So don't go there!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been silently agreeing with a lot of what people have to say here, on all counts, 'cause in some way at some time, it's ALL been TRUE.

But this one - the thing that keeps coming to mind is, if a subject bothers you, and it's a pretty damned easy thing to know WHERE that type of subject is going to be posted, don't go there!

I mean, come on. If people discussing their sexuality or proclivities in relation to bothers a person, it's a pretty safe assumption that that kind of talk is going to go on in the SEX & SEXUALITY forum - so don't go there!

And I'm NOT talking about things like, oh, you're reading a thread in the Relationships forum about the latest window cleaner and suddenly someone starts spouting off about fat, Polish blondes. That would have been out of left field and unexpected, and therefore bothersome.

But it's a safe bet that someone is going to post about wanting a 3some in the sexuality forum. Welcome or not, that's where it's going to be.

So don't go there!!!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

i agree with this 100 percent.

which is why i don't read those threads.

i don't care to know what is going on in there. but i would never suggest people should not talk about it. obviously there are more than a couple of people here who enjoy going there and discussing the things they do, which is why they do it. plus they have found other people who have that in common with them. and should always feel comfortable doing so and not be judged or told that it grosses other people out.

there are many things on dgn that are discussed that i don't have an interest in for various reasons and i avoid it. not just the sex, but sometimes relationship stuff in general, politics, religon... there are many things discussed all over the board that are not going to interest EVERYONE or that not eveyone will agree should even be here.

for the most part as long as a title is labeled accordingly, and with a warning that it might not be suitable for kids/work then i find nothing wrong with any of the content that is ever posted on dgn.

UNLESS it is hateful and directed towards dgners personally, or an entire group of people based on skin color, sexual preference, body type, social status etc. those are the things i don't agree with and think should not be here. things that are purposely bashing people based on a closed minded opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some mods are good, some are bad, some use personal vandettas to moderate. 
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

i was not going to comment on this but then i saw sooth put in the :whistling

as a reply to this so i wonder:

what does this exactly mean?

some are good some are bad? as in some do a good job, some suck. or some are good :innocent and some are the bad seed :devil

i don't understand what personal vendetta a mod would have?

i mean i am not trying to be a smart ass about this but i really don't get it?

from what i have seen of the mods on the board and in discussions in the staff chat- i have NEVER gotten this impression.

all i have ever seen is the mods trying to do

1. what they feel is right, based on personal opinion combined with what troy wants the board to be

2. trying to come to a fair compromise. it might not always seem fair, but i have yet to see a mod do anything for their own personal gain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It means I am surprised to read someone else say what was said and I can not go into detail.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

ok i don't need details, nor do i want details because details tend to involve drama and i really do hate drama. :happy:

examples might work? even hypothetical ones? i mean i just really didn't understand ted's post/comment. not so much your :whistling to the comment.

i see you agree, for your own personal reasons.

but the point is i still just don't get it. :nut

Link to comment
Share on other sites

examples might work? even hypothetical ones? i mean i just really didn't understand ted's post/comment. not so much your  :whistling  to the comment.

i see you agree, for your own personal reasons.

but the point is i still just don't get it.  :nut

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Ok ask Ted because I can't give hypothetical examples either. :laughing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh i have noticed the cliques develope over the almost one year i  have been here. And basiclly that is what i am referring to when i stated the clique part in my first post. I have no problem with IRL close friendships, but when those friendships come to the board and (kowningly or unkowningly) ignore fellow memebrs and newbies, it does not create a welcoming atmosphere that would draw a newbie or even a less social memebr out to meet people. If i was on the net and i felt unwelcomed why would i bother to venture out to a IRL social event to meet these people who dont even want to bother with me online?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I tend to be my own clique heh. Always have, always will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of the few years of being on this board I never been part of any small ridiculous cliques or whutzoever nor bowed down and kiss any fuckin butts for anything. I just enjoy being myself and thats that. Fars to my knowledge this board has always been a layed-back friendly goth community minus the drama. Which I have no problem with, I hate drama and rather deal with boredom (unless if its somewhere else, dont know the people and the reason has to be totally stupid yet hilarious)

However I do have to admit the clique thing does get old though, we need more leaders than followers (which im not gonna list any names).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.4k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 76 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.