Jump to content

Jagger has not aged well :(


Onyx

Recommended Posts

Yuk!

He doesn't even sound the same to me.

It's not *just* the age I don't think. He just has not taken care of himself. I never really loved his music, but I did used to like to watch him move.

Bowie is still sexy and yummy to me - Jagger's really hard on the eyes - such a disappointment. Something else is missing too - no enthusiasm, no oomph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry gals, But Mick still looks good....To me...And I thought he sounded OK at the Super 1/2 time....it was a little rough, but the guy was jumping around and shakin it like he's still a young adult...AND the guy IS 62 years old....

The guy is road hard for sure, but all in all, I think he still got it going on.

And Bowie is still hot too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes.

IMO he looks a hell of a lot better than most 60+ folks...and is way more active than most could ever hope to be.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Well that is certainly true.

I can't help comparing him to Bowie though. I wanted Mick to stay as pretty as him! heh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's with women thinking that someone that looks like they should be in a grave looks hot???? Jagger looks like a bloody walking corpse.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

That would be Keith Richards.

Eek.

I could throw a quarter and the crevices in his face could catch it.

Yikes.

And, what's up with Mic and his belly tops? Are he and Britney Spears using the same stylist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Forum Statistics

    38.9k
    Total Topics
    820.4k
    Total Posts
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 54 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.